Row over 2023 CEC appointment law returns to Supreme Court

The Opposition has again questioned the Election Commission's independence, focusing on the 2023 law that replaced the Chief Justice of India with a Union Cabinet minister nominated by the Prime Minister on the selection committee for the CEC and Election Commissioners. The Bill was passed by voice vote in the Rajya Sabha on December 12, 2023 and in the Lok Sabha on December 21, when 100 Lok Sabha MPs stood suspended. Justices Dipankar Datta and Satish Chandra Sharma differed on referring the challenge to a larger Bench and sent it to the CJI.

Written by AI from News18 — India · not yet reviewed by an editor · Published 24 Sept 2026, 1:00 pm IST

Source

News18 — India · read the original report ↗

#election commission#cec appointment#supreme court#parliament#opposition

Desk check · some claims need care

What the desk checked (5)

Election Commissioners Sukhbir Singh Sandhu and Vivek Joshi recorded objections at least 14 times over 10 months. — Attributed in source to an Indian Express report; not independently confirmed in the text and rejected by the Election Commission.
The 2023 Act created a three-member selection panel of the PM, Leader of Opposition in Lok Sabha and a Union Cabinet minister nominated by the PM, replacing the CJI. — Figure and composition appear in the source with reference to the named Act; internally consistent.
The Bill was passed by voice vote in the Rajya Sabha on December 12, 2023, and in the Lok Sabha on December 21, 2023 after about 1 hour 40 minutes of discussion. — Dates and duration appear in the source and are internally consistent.
146 MPs across both Houses were suspended during the Winter Session; 100 Lok Sabha MPs stood suspended on the day of passage, when the Opposition had 142 Lok Sabha MPs. — Figures appear in the source; no originating document cited.
Justices Dipankar Datta and Satish Chandra Sharma differed on referring the challenge to a Constitution Bench and sent the matter to the CJI. — Attributed to court proceedings described in the source; no order copy cited.

Written by AI from News18 — India · not yet reviewed by an editor · How we use AI · Report an error

Analysts’ view opinion

AI Political Analyst

This looks like a legal dispute, but its core is a fight over political credibility. The fact that two of the three members of the selection committee come from the executive gives the Opposition a durable weapon on "EC independence" — while the Opposition's near-silence in the Lok Sabha in December 2023 gives the government an equally strong counter. With the two-judge Bench itself split and the matter now with the Chief Justice of India, this argument is set to run for a long while.

The Opposition's strategy is to shift the attack from individual outcomes to the appointment process itself, building a longer-term institutional critique.
The government's counter is ready-made: the Opposition walked out during the Rajya Sabha debate, and in the Lok Sabha only AIMIM's Asaduddin Owaisi spoke against the Bill.
Passage by voice vote on a day when 100 Lok Sabha Opposition MPs stood suspended hands the Opposition a strong process-and-legitimacy argument.
Justice Datta's observation that the Leader of Opposition's role could be "largely ornamental" strengthens the Opposition's narrative, while Justice Sharma's point that the question was never settled by the court supports the government's position.
Combined with impeachment demands against the CEC and reports of internal EC objections, this risks casting a credibility shadow over electoral outcomes well ahead of the next general election.

What to watch — Whether the Chief Justice of India refers the matter to a Constitution Bench, and how soon it is heard, will decide if this stays a courtroom question or becomes a campaign issue.

The story does not establish that the law is unconstitutional or that EC decisions were actually compromised — the EC has rejected the report, and no judicial verdict has been delivered.

Deep dive

Research brief · 8 facts · 6 dates · exam-ready

The brief

Context

The Chief Election Commissioner and Other Election Commissioners (Appointment, Conditions of Service and Term of Office) Act, 2023 created a three-member selection committee of the Prime Minister, the Leader of Opposition in the Lok Sabha and a Union Cabinet minister nominated by the PM. It replaced an interim arrangement laid down by a five-judge Supreme Court Bench in Anoop Baranwal vs Union of India (March 2023), which had included the Chief Justice of India in the panel until Parliament legislated. The law is now under constitutional challenge, and a two-judge Bench of Justices Dipankar Datta and Satish Chandra Sharma has differed on whether it should go to a Constitution Bench. The row has revived alongside fresh Opposition criticism of CEC Gyanesh Kumar after a report on internal objections by two Election Commissioners.

Key facts

The 2023 Act's selection committee has three members: the Prime Minister, the Leader of Opposition in the Lok Sabha, and a Union Cabinet minister nominated by the Prime Minister; the President formally appoints.
The 2023 law replaced the Chief Justice of India with a PM-nominated Cabinet minister, leaving two of three panel members from the executive.
In March 2023, in Anoop Baranwal vs Union of India, a five-judge Constitution Bench directed appointments by a panel of PM, LoP and CJI until Parliament enacted a law.
The Bill was passed by voice vote in the Rajya Sabha on December 12, 2023, after Opposition objections and a walkout; Congress MP Randeep Singh Surjewala initiated the debate.
The Lok Sabha passed it on December 21, 2023 after a discussion of around 1 hour and 40 minutes, by voice vote, with 12 MPs participating, mostly from BJP and NDA.
AIMIM's Asaduddin Owaisi was the only Opposition MP to speak against the Bill in the Lok Sabha; Rahul Gandhi was present, not suspended, but did not speak.
By December 19, 2023, 141 MPs from both Houses were suspended; on December 21 three more Congress MPs were suspended, taking suspended Lok Sabha MPs to 100 and the both-Houses total to 146 in the Winter Session. The Opposition had 142 MPs in the Lok Sabha then.
An Indian Express report said Election Commissioners Sukhbir Singh Sandhu and Vivek Joshi formally recorded objections at least 14 times over 10 months; the EC rejected the report.

Timeline

March 2023Supreme Court in Anoop Baranwal vs Union of India directs that CEC/EC appointments be made on the recommendation of a panel of PM, LoP and CJI until Parliament makes a law.
December 12, 2023Rajya Sabha passes the Bill by voice vote after Opposition objections and a walkout.
December 13, 2023Two intruders enter the Lok Sabha chamber and release smoke canisters, causing a major security breach.
December 19, 2023141 MPs from both Houses stand suspended amid protests over the security breach.
December 21, 2023Three more Congress MPs suspended, taking suspended Lok Sabha MPs to 100; Lok Sabha passes the Bill by voice vote the same day.
Recent (Wednesday, as reported)Justices Dipankar Datta and Satish Chandra Sharma differ on referring the challenge to a Constitution Bench and send the matter to the CJI.

Who has a stake

Election Commission of India — Its institutional independence and public perception of independence are under question; it has rejected reports of internal dissent as normal deliberation.
CEC Gyanesh Kumar — Faces fresh Opposition criticism over the functioning of the poll panel and the appointment process.
Election Commissioners Sukhbir Singh Sandhu and Vivek Joshi — Reported to have recorded objections at least 14 times over 10 months to decisions taken in the name of the full commission.
Union Government / Prime Minister — Defends the 2023 law; under the Act the PM and his nominated Cabinet minister form two of three selection committee members.
Opposition parties and Rahul Gandhi — Allege the electoral process is being undermined; face questions over their limited participation in the Lok Sabha debate in December 2023.
Supreme Court / Chief Justice of India — Must decide whether the challenge to the 2023 law goes to a larger Bench and whether Parliament could replace the CJI on the panel.

Why it matters

The composition of the panel that picks the CEC and Election Commissioners determines how far the referee of Indian elections is insulated from the government of the day. With two of three selection committee members drawn from the executive, the court must decide whether the Election Commission is not only independent but seen to be independent. The outcome will also settle how far Parliament can legislate over an arrangement crafted by a Constitution Bench.

UPSC angle

Prelims pointers

Anoop Baranwal vs Union of India (March 2023): five-judge Constitution Bench prescribed PM, LoP and CJI panel for EC appointments until Parliament legislated.
CEC and Other Election Commissioners (Appointment, Conditions of Service and Term of Office) Act, 2023: panel of PM, LoP in Lok Sabha and a PM-nominated Union Cabinet minister; President appoints.
Bill passed by voice vote: Rajya Sabha December 12, 2023; Lok Sabha December 21, 2023.
December 13, 2023: Lok Sabha security breach involving two intruders and smoke canisters; 146 MPs suspended across both Houses in the Winter Session.
Current challenge heard by Justices Dipankar Datta and Satish Chandra Sharma, who differed and referred the matter to the CJI for a larger Bench.
Justice Datta flagged that collective responsibility could make the Cabinet minister unlikely to oppose the PM, rendering the LoP's role 'largely ornamental'.

Mains framing

The dispute over the 2023 CEC appointments law is essentially about institutional design: whether a body entrusted with the superintendence of elections can be chosen by a committee in which the executive holds a structural majority. The Supreme Court's interim scheme in Anoop Baranwal sought to dilute exclusive executive control by including the CJI, but it was expressly transitional, and Parliament replaced the CJI with a PM-nominated Cabinet minister. Justice Datta's reasoning — that collective responsibility makes such a minister unlikely to differ from the Prime Minister, leaving the Leader of Opposition's presence 'largely ornamental', and that the EC must be perceived as independent — captures the petitioners' case; Justice Sharma's view that the Court has never decided whether Parliament may substitute the CJI captures the counterpoint about legislative competence and separation of powers. The controversy is sharpened by reported internal objections by two Election Commissioners, which the EC calls routine deliberation, and by the manner of the law's passage: voice votes, a Rajya Sabha walkout, and a Lok Sabha debate of about 1 hour 40 minutes with 100 Opposition MPs suspended and only one Opposition MP speaking against it. The way forward suggested by the story's own framing lies with the larger Bench the CJI may constitute, and with Parliament's own capacity for scrutiny rather than passage amid disruption.

Key terms

Anoop Baranwal vs Union of India: March 2023 five-judge Constitution Bench ruling that set an interim PM-LoP-CJI panel for appointing Election Commissioners until Parliament made a law.
CEC and Other ECs Act, 2023: Law creating a three-member selection committee of the PM, LoP in Lok Sabha and a PM-nominated Union Cabinet minister to recommend EC appointments.
Voice vote: Parliamentary method of deciding a motion by ayes and noes without recording individual votes; used for this Bill in both Houses.
Collective responsibility: Principle binding Council of Ministers to the government's position, cited by Justice Datta as reason a Cabinet minister may not oppose the PM on the panel.
Constitution Bench / larger Bench: A Bench of five or more judges for substantial constitutional questions; the two-judge Bench referred the matter to the CJI to consider one.
Leader of Opposition (LoP): Head of the largest opposition party in the Lok Sabha; the sole non-executive member of the current selection committee.

Practice questions

Critically examine whether the composition of the selection committee under the CEC and Other Election Commissioners Act, 2023 safeguards the independence of the Election Commission of India.
'An institution must not only be independent but must be seen to be independent.' Discuss this principle with reference to the appointment of Election Commissioners in India.
Discuss the implications of passing significant legislation by voice vote amid mass suspension of MPs for the quality of parliamentary scrutiny in India.

Grounded only in the source report — figures and dates are the source's, not inferred.

Next storySon arrested in Kanpur trader's murder case, say police →

← All stories