Crime Haryana

Gurugram hit-and-run accused, cousin sent to two-day police remand

A Gurugram court on Wednesday sent hit-and-run accused Kalyan Bainsla, 33, and his cousin Lovneesh, 34, to two days of police remand. Judge Nidhi Beniwal allowed the police request, made to recreate the crime scene, with the next hearing on September 18. The two were nabbed from Rajgarh in Rajasthan on Tuesday. Bainsla was booked for attempt to murder after police examined Instagram videos and CCTV footage of biker Shivani Chauhan being struck on Golf Course Road.

Written by AI from Hindustan Times — India · not yet reviewed by an editor · Published 16 Sept 2026, 7:13 pm IST

Source

Hindustan Times — India · read the original report ↗

#gurugram#hit-and-run#road rage#police remand#bns

Desk check · some claims need care

What the desk checked (5)

A Gurugram court sent Kalyan Bainsla and cousin Lavnish/Lovneesh to two days of police remand, with next hearing on September 18. — Attributed to an official and to defence counsel Lalit Bindal; the court is named as that of Nidhi Beniwal.
Bainsla, 33, was arrested on Tuesday, 15 September 2026, and the pair were nabbed from Rajgarh in Rajasthan. — Figure and date appear in the source, attributed to police; the source spells the cousin's name variously as Lavnish, Lovneesh and gives his age as 34.
Police booked Bainsla for attempt to murder after examining Instagram videos and CCTV footage, and added BNS Sections 109, 78 and 79 to the FIR. — Attributed to Police Commissioner Sibash Kabiraj and to police; section numbers appear in the source.
Victim Shivani Chauhan, alias Siya, 27, says an attempt was made on her life and demands arrest of two others in the car. — Direct quotes attributed to the victim; allegations remain unverified claims.
Bainsla's cousin Kamal said Bainsla is innocent and the woman is 'playing the victim card'. — Attributed to Kamal speaking to PTI Videos; contested claim.

Written by AI from Hindustan Times — India · not yet reviewed by an editor · How we use AI · Report an error

Analysts’ view opinion

AI Legal Analyst

This case has moved beyond a road-rage mishap into territory where everything turns on proving intent. Because the FIR invokes Section 109 BNS (attempt to murder), police must show not mere rash driving but an intention to kill — which is exactly why they sought custody to recreate the scene. The defence objection that 24 hours of custody should have sufficed for that exercise is a legitimate procedural argument, though the court weighed it and still granted two days.

Police remand is not a finding of guilt — it is a limited, time-bound permission a court grants after balancing investigative need against personal liberty.
Sustaining Section 109 requires proof of deliberate intent, not just speed or negligence, making authentication of the CCTV and Instagram footage central to the prosecution's case.
Registering a suo motu case without a formal complaint, and later adding Sections 78 and 79 on the victim's complaint, is procedurally open to police in cognisable offences, but each added section must be independently supported by evidence.
The victim's demand that others in the car be acted against raises the distinct legal question of whether they were mere passengers or shared a common intention.
The story states police alleged an escape attempt after arrest, and that the accused was earlier untraceable; such allegations typically weigh in bail hearings, though they do not make refusal of bail a foregone conclusion.

What to watch — Watch the September 18 hearing for whether police seek further custody or the accused is sent to judicial custody, how the court treats any bail plea, and whether Section 109 survives into the chargesheet.

A remand order establishes nothing about guilt; the allegations remain under investigation, and this story does not settle the medical findings, the video forensics, or the role of the other occupants of the car.

Deep dive

Research brief · 8 facts · 7 dates · exam-ready

The brief

Context

On Golf Course Road in Gurugram, a car driven by gym owner Kalyan Bainsla allegedly grazed and knocked down biker Shivani Chauhan (alias Siya), sending her skidding down the road. The incident surfaced after the biker posted a video on Instagram on September 14, prompting Gurugram Police to register a suo motu case at Sector-56 Police Station in the absence of a formal complaint. Bainsla, who absconded after giving a media interview, was nabbed with his cousin from Rajgarh in Rajasthan and booked for attempt to murder after police examined Instagram videos and CCTV footage. A city court has now sent both to two days of police remand to recreate the crime scene.

Key facts

A Gurugram court on Wednesday sent accused Kalyan Bainsla (33) and his cousin Lavnish/Lovneesh (34) to two days of police remand; the next hearing is on September 18.
The remand was sought by police to recreate the crime scene and was granted by the court of Nidhi Beniwal.
The two were nabbed from Rajgarh in Rajasthan on Tuesday, September 15, a short distance from Gurugram.
Police added Section 109 (attempt to murder), Section 78 (physical and digital stalking) and Section 79 (acts against the modesty of a woman) of the BNS to the FIR on the biker's complaint.
Bainsla was driving a Maruti Suzuki Ciaz; Chauhan, 27, was riding an Aprilia RS 457. The car, registered in the name of an acquaintance, has been impounded.
On September 14 the biker shared an Instagram video of being struck the previous morning; with no formal complaint, police filed a suo motu case at Sector-56 Police Station.
Gurugram Police Commissioner Sibash Kabiraj said Bainsla was booked for attempt to murder after scrutiny of Instagram videos and CCTV footage.
Bainsla's counsel Lalit Bindal argued his client had already been in police custody for 24 hours, during which the scene could have been recreated.

Timeline

Sunday morning (as per source)Bainsla's car allegedly grazed biker Shivani Chauhan on Golf Course Road, knocking her off and sending her skidding down the road.
September 14The biker shared a video of the incident on Instagram; police, unable to get a formal complaint, filed a suo motu case at Sector-56 Police Station.
Before arrestBainsla gave a media interview, switched off his mobile phone and absconded; three police teams were formed to track him.
Tuesday, September 15Bainsla and cousin nabbed from Rajgarh, Rajasthan. He allegedly tried to escape custody on the pretext of urinating, fell, was injured and given first aid.
Tuesday nightChauhan recorded her statement in the district court and told the media the arrest alone was not enough.
WednesdayCourt granted two days of police remand for both accused.
September 18Next hearing scheduled.

Who has a stake

Shivani Chauhan (alias Siya), 27 — Victim; injured and advised MRI and X-rays; demands strictest punishment and arrest of two others allegedly in the car.
Kalyan Bainsla, 33, gym owner — Accused of attempt to murder; in two-day police custody; faces recreation of crime scene.
Lavnish/Lovneesh, 34 — Cousin who was in the car with Bainsla; also sent to two days of police remand.
Gurugram Police (Commissioner Sibash Kabiraj, DCP East Sandeep Kumar) — Filed suo motu case, invoked attempt-to-murder charge based on video evidence, impounded the car and must prove intent.
Court of Judge Nidhi Beniwal — Deciding on remand and further proceedings; next hearing September 18.
Kamal, Bainsla's cousin — Publicly claims Bainsla is innocent and that the victim is 'playing the victim card'.
Haryana women's panel — Has taken note of the hit-and-run video (as referenced in the story).

Why it matters

The case shows how social media video and CCTV footage can trigger a suo motu police case and even an attempt-to-murder charge in what began as a road-rage hit-and-run. It also raises questions about road safety for women riders, the adequacy of arrests versus punishment, and the evidentiary weight given to digital records under the new criminal codes.

UPSC angle

Prelims pointers

BNS Section 109 relates to attempt to murder; Section 78 to physical and digital stalking; Section 79 to acts against the modesty of a woman.
A suo motu case is one registered by police on their own initiative without a formal complaint — here at Sector-56 Police Station, Gurugram.
Police remand of two days was granted by the Gurugram court of Judge Nidhi Beniwal; next hearing September 18.
Gurugram Police Commissioner: Sibash Kabiraj; DCP (East): Sandeep Kumar.
Accused Kalyan Bainsla (33) and cousin Lavnish (34) were arrested from Rajgarh, Rajasthan.
Victim Shivani Chauhan said she contested the 2022 municipal election from Kalkaji, Delhi, as the youngest candidate.

Mains framing

The Gurugram Golf Course Road incident illustrates how road rage is increasingly being treated not as a traffic offence but as a crime against the person: after examining Instagram videos and CCTV footage, police invoked BNS Section 109 (attempt to murder) along with Sections 78 and 79, with DCP (East) Sandeep Kumar asserting the accused deliberately hit the biker after an argument with intent to kill. The case also highlights three systemic issues. First, evidence and initiative: with no formal complaint initially, the police acted suo motu on the strength of a viral video, showing both the power of citizen-generated digital evidence and the gap in immediate formal reporting. Second, procedure and accountability: police sought remand to recreate the crime scene while the defence argued 24 hours of custody had already been available, and the accused had earlier absconded after a media interview and allegedly tried to flee custody. Third, victim confidence: Chauhan's insistence that arrest alone is not "strict action", her demand that the two other occupants be arrested, and the counter-narrative that she is "playing the victim card" point to the reputational contest that surrounds such cases. The way forward suggested by the facts lies in careful forensic reconstruction and preservation of digital evidence, action against all occupants if their role is established, and time-bound trial so that outcomes rather than arrests determine deterrence.

Key terms

Police remand: Court-authorised custody of an accused with the police for investigation; here two days to recreate the crime scene.
Suo motu case: A case registered by the police or authority on its own motion, without a formal complaint from a victim.
BNS Section 109: Provision of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita dealing with attempt to murder, invoked against the accused here.
BNS Sections 78 and 79: Provisions on physical and digital stalking (78) and acts intended to outrage the modesty of a woman (79).
Hit-and-run: An incident where a vehicle strikes a person and the driver leaves the scene without stopping to help or report.

Practice questions

Digital evidence such as social media videos and CCTV footage is reshaping criminal investigation in India. Discuss with reference to suo motu police action in road rage cases.
When can a road rage incident be charged as attempt to murder rather than a traffic offence? Examine the role of proving intent, using the Gurugram Golf Course Road case.
Arrest is not the same as accountability. Critically analyse the challenges of ensuring victim confidence and timely justice in high-profile crime cases in Indian cities.

Grounded only in the source report — figures and dates are the source's, not inferred.

Next storyAaditya Thackeray responds to CBI FIR in Disha Salian death case →

← All stories