IIMs weigh common UG entrance test, centralised MBA counselling

The IIMs are considering a common entrance test for undergraduate management programmes, a centralised counselling platform for MBA admissions, a uniform fee-refund policy and inter-IIM student transfers. According to minutes of the Coordination Forum of IIMs meeting, chaired by then Union education minister Dharmendra Pradhan in Ahmedabad on May 14 and obtained by Hindustan Times through RTI, directors discussed the proposals. Thirteen of the 22 IIMs run UG programmes. The institutes were divided on a common test.

Written by AI from Hindustan Times — India · not yet reviewed by an editor · Published 22 Sept 2026, 7:33 am IST

Source

Hindustan Times — India · read the original report ↗

#iim#admissions#entrance exam#mba#education policy

Desk check · compared with the source

What the desk checked (5)

IIMs are considering a common UG entrance test, centralised MBA counselling, uniform fee-refund policy and inter-IIM transfers. — Attributed to official documents/minutes accessed by HT via RTI; appears in source.
The Coordination Forum meeting was chaired by then Union education minister Dharmendra Pradhan in Ahmedabad on May 14, 2026. — Stated in source from minutes; the source also says directors met on May 14, with dates internally consistent.
13 of the 22 IIMs offer UG programmes; seven offer five-year IPMs using three admission mechanisms. — Figures appear in source, unattributed to a named official.
IIM Mumbai was tasked with developing a prototype of a JoSAA-style common counselling platform, sent to the ministry by end of July. — Attributed to an unnamed senior IIM Mumbai official speaking anonymously.
A standardised refund policy modelled on UGC guidelines is to be implemented from academic year 2026-27. — Attributed to the forum via the minutes; source notes several IIMs still follow differing rules.

Written by AI from Hindustan Times — India · not yet reviewed by an editor · How we use AI · Report an error

Analysts’ view opinion

AI Policy Analyst

This looks like a genuine attempt to reduce the exam-and-fee burden students carry — but its key weakness is in the design itself. Under the IIM Act, 2017, the Coordination Forum is only an advisory body, unlike the IIT Council whose decisions bind. That means a common UG test can happen only if the IIMs converge on it; a minister's preference alone will not deliver it. Consensus looks easier on fee refunds and centralised counselling, while views on merging entrance tests are openly divided.

Design constraint: because the forum is advisory, achieving uniformity while protecting institutional autonomy depends on persuasion rather than mandate.
The beneficiaries are primarily students, especially families who cannot absorb multiple application fees and non-refundable seat-booking amounts.
Newer IIMs also gain, since a JoSAA-style platform could ease the vacancy problem created when students leave after receiving offers from older IIMs.
The counter-argument is substantive: programmes such as one admitting through JEE Advanced for AI and analytics point to genuinely different academic requirements that a single test may not serve.
Leveraging existing scores like JEE, CUET, CLAT and IPMAT is a pragmatic middle path — lowering burden without creating yet another examination.

What to watch — Watch the sub-committee's SOP, the education ministry's verdict on the IIM Mumbai prototype, and whether the uniform refund policy is actually applied across all IIMs from 2026–27.

Nothing is settled — the minutes record discussion only; the story does not establish a final decision, timeline or enforcement mechanism, and the ministry did not respond to queries.

Deep dive

Research brief · 8 facts · 8 dates · exam-ready

The brief

Context

India's 22 Indian Institutes of Management (IIMs) currently admit undergraduate and MBA students through a patchwork of entrance tests and independent admission processes, unlike IITs which use a single test and centralised JoSAA counselling. At a Coordination Forum of IIMs meeting chaired by the then Union education minister Dharmendra Pradhan in Ahmedabad, directors debated a common UG entrance test, a centralised MBA counselling platform, a uniform fee-refund policy and inter-IIM student transfers. Hindustan Times obtained the minutes through an RTI application. Under the Indian Institute of Management Act, 2017, the forum is only an advisory body, so its conclusions are not binding on individual IIMs.

Key facts

Minutes of the Coordination Forum of IIMs meeting chaired by then education minister Dharmendra Pradhan in Ahmedabad on May 14, 2026 record discussions on UG entrance tests, MBA admissions SOPs, inter-IIM migration and fee refunds.
The education ministry circulated the minutes to IIMs on June 17; HT obtained them through an RTI application on September 15.
13 of the 22 IIMs currently offer UG programmes; IIM Guwahati is the newly established 22nd IIM.
Seven IIMs — Indore, Rohtak, Ranchi, Jammu, Bodh Gaya, Amritsar and Shillong — run five-year IPMs using three admission mechanisms: IPMAT, JIPMAT and IIM Rohtak's own aptitude test.
IIM Lucknow's BS in AI & Business Analytics admits via JEE Advanced; IIM Mumbai's BS in Digital Science and Business Management uses JEE Main; IIM Udaipur admits to BBA without any entrance exam.
IIM Bodh Gaya, Jammu, Amritsar and Ranchi supported a common entrance test, with Jammu and Bodh Gaya favouring one conducted by the National Testing Agency (NTA); IIM Udaipur suggested using existing JEE, CUET or CLAT scores.
Members discussed a common digital MBA counselling platform modelled on IITs' JoSAA, with freeze, slide and float options; IIM Mumbai was tasked with a prototype, sent to the ministry by end-July.
Most IIMs follow a UGC-modelled refund policy deducting only Rs 1,000 before classes begin, but IIM Udaipur deducts Rs 30,000 after classes start and IIM Calcutta states fees for some programmes are non-refundable under any circumstances; a standardised policy is proposed from academic year 2026-27.

Timeline

2011IIM Indore launches India's first Integrated Programme in Management (IPM).
2017Indian Institute of Management Act enacted, making the Coordination Forum of IIMs an advisory body, unlike the IIT Council whose decisions bind IITs.
September 2025Coordination Forum of IIMs holds its first meeting in eight years.
May 14, 2026Forum meeting in Ahmedabad chaired by then Union education minister Dharmendra Pradhan discusses common UG test, MBA counselling, refunds and inter-IIM migration.
June 17Education ministry circulates the minutes of the meeting to IIMs.
End of JulyIIM Mumbai sends the prototype of the common digital counselling platform to the education ministry.
September 15HT obtains the minutes through a Right to Information application.
Academic year 2026-27Target for implementing a standardised, UGC-modelled fee-refund policy across IIMs.

Who has a stake

UG and IPM aspirants — Face more than 10 entrance examinations, multiple application fees and non-refundable seat-booking payments; stand to gain from fewer tests and uniform refunds.
Older IIMs (Indore, Kozhikode, Calcutta, Bangalore) — Defend programme-specific admission routes and autonomy; Kozhikode favours 'minimal regulation' and flexibility for individual IIMs.
Newer IIMs (Bodh Gaya, Jammu, Amritsar, Ranchi) — Support a common test and better coordination, as seats fall vacant when students leave after receiving offers from older IIMs.
Union education ministry / Dharmendra Pradhan — Pushing to avoid multiple UG tests as a 'stakeholder' rather than an interfering regulator; reviewing IIM Mumbai's counselling prototype.
Coordination Forum of IIMs — An advisory body under the IIM Act, 2017; has directed a sub-committee to draft SOPs on refunds, counselling and inter-IIM migration.
National Testing Agency (NTA) — Proposed by IIM Jammu and Bodh Gaya as the conducting agency for a possible common UG management entrance test.

Why it matters

With 13 IIMs running UG courses through at least seven different admission routes, aspirants bear repeated test, application and seat-blocking costs, while newer IIMs are left with vacant seats. The proposals would bring IIM admissions closer to the IIT model of one test plus JoSAA-style counselling, but the forum's advisory status under the IIM Act, 2017 means reform depends on voluntary consensus among institutionally autonomous IIMs.

UPSC angle

Prelims pointers

Indian Institute of Management Act, 2017 makes the Coordination Forum of IIMs an advisory body; IIT Council decisions are binding on IITs.
There are 22 IIMs; IIM Guwahati is the 22nd, mentored by IIM Ahmedabad director Bharat Bhaskar.
CAT is the IIMs' common entrance test for postgraduate programmes; UG routes include IPMAT, JIPMAT, JEE Main, JEE Advanced and institute-specific tests.
IIM Indore launched India's first Integrated Programme in Management (IPM) in 2011.
JoSAA (Joint Seat Allocation Authority) is the IIT seat-allocation system with freeze, slide and float options, proposed as a model for MBA counselling.
Standardised IIM fee-refund policy modelled on UGC guidelines proposed from academic year 2026-27, with only Rs 1,000 deducted for withdrawal before classes begin.

Mains framing

The proliferation of undergraduate management entrance examinations across IIMs — more than 10 tests for UG and IPM courses, with seven IPM-offering IIMs alone using three mechanisms — reflects the institutional autonomy granted by the IIM Act, 2017, under which the Coordination Forum is merely advisory. The costs fall on students: repeated application and testing expenses, examination stress, and non-refundable seat-booking amounts paid at several IIMs, alongside inconsistent refund rules ranging from a Rs 1,000 deduction to complete non-refundability. Newer IIMs additionally suffer vacant seats when candidates migrate to older institutes. Yet resistance is principled, not merely turf-based: as IIM Lucknow argues, a BS in AI and Business Analytics genuinely requires JEE Advanced-level mathematics, and IIM Indore notes IIMs differ in mission and pedagogy from engineering institutions. A calibrated way forward, as the forum itself indicated, is to avoid creating new tests and instead leverage credible existing examinations (IPMAT, JEE, CUET, CLAT), build a JoSAA-style common counselling platform with freeze-slide-float options, set a cut-off date after which older IIMs stop admissions and share data with newer ones, and adopt a UGC-modelled uniform refund policy from 2026-27 — with the sub-committee's SOP grounded in analysis of students' test-taking patterns and socio-economic backgrounds, as the then higher education secretary urged.

Key terms

Coordination Forum of IIMs: Advisory body under the IIM Act, 2017 chaired by the Union education minister; met on May 14, 2026 in Ahmedabad after first reconvening in September 2025.
IPM / IPMAT: Five-year Integrated Programme in Management offered by seven IIMs, and the shared aptitude test used for admission to several of them.
JIPMAT: Joint entrance test used by some IIMs for admission to their five-year integrated management programmes.
JoSAA: Joint Seat Allocation Authority, the centralised IIT counselling system with freeze, slide and float options, proposed as the model for IIM MBA counselling.
CAT: Common Admission Test conducted by IIMs for admission to postgraduate management programmes.
SOP (Standard Operating Procedure): Uniform procedure the forum's sub-committee is to draft for MBA admissions, fee refunds and inter-IIM student migration.

Practice questions

Should undergraduate admissions to IIMs be consolidated into a single common entrance test? Examine the arguments of older and newer IIMs, and suggest a middle path.
The Coordination Forum of IIMs is advisory while the IIT Council's decisions are binding. Discuss how this difference under the IIM Act, 2017 shapes the prospects for system-wide admission reform.
Multiple entrance tests and non-refundable seat-booking fees impose costs on students. Evaluate centralised counselling and a uniform refund policy as remedies for equity in higher education access.

Grounded only in the source report — figures and dates are the source's, not inferred.

Next storyGold edges higher as falling oil prices ease rate-hike bets →

← All stories