Pakistan asserts right to self-defence at UN Security Council

Pakistan told the UN Security Council it has every right to defend itself under international law. Speaking during a debate on Afghanistan's security situation five years after the Taliban's return to power, Pakistan's Permanent Representative to the UN, Asim Iftikhar Ahmad, said more than 4,700 Pakistanis had died from terrorism emanating from Afghanistan in the past three years. Islamabad said it retains the right to respond, as and when desired, to quell terrorist elements enjoying patronage from Kabul.

Written by AI from The Express Tribune (Pakistan) · not yet reviewed by an editor · Published 18 Sept 2026, 1:28 pm IST

Source

The Express Tribune (Pakistan) · read the original report ↗

#pakistan#afghanistan#taliban#terrorism#unsc

Desk check · some claims need care

What the desk checked (5)

Pakistan told the UN Security Council it has every right to defend itself under international law. — Attributed in source to Asim Iftikhar Ahmad, Pakistan's Permanent Representative to the UN.
More than 4,700 Pakistanis died from terrorism emanating from Afghanistan in the past three years. — Figure appears in source, attributed to the Pakistani envoy; no independent data cited.
Groups including BLA, Majeed Brigade, TTP, ISKP and Al Qaeda operate with foreign infiltration and local abettors in Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa and Balochistan. — Asserted by the editorial without a named source.
Kabul failed to uphold 2020 Doha pledges that Afghan soil would not be used against neighbours. — Editorial assertion; Doha 2020 commitment referenced without documentation.
UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres and the SCO expressed concern over Taliban policies towards women and girls; Human Rights Watch urged withholding recognition. — Attributed to named institutions in source; wording is the editorial's paraphrase.

Written by AI from The Express Tribune (Pakistan) · not yet reviewed by an editor · How we use AI · Report an error

Analysts’ view opinion

AI Strategic Affairs Analyst

Invoking the "right to self-defence" at the UN Security Council is more than a diplomatic complaint — it is groundwork for legally framing any cross-border action Islamabad may choose to take later. The figure of more than 4,700 deaths in three years is being deployed to recast militancy as external aggression rather than an internal law-and-order problem. Equally, Kabul's response does not appear in this story, so what we have is Islamabad's case, not an adjudicated one.

The precise phrasing "self-defence under international law" is a deliberate choice, designed to pre-position diplomatic cover for possible strikes across the western frontier.
By foregrounding Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa and Balochistan, Pakistan bundles two distinct challenges — TTP-style militancy and Baloch separatism — into a single externally sourced threat narrative.
Citing the 2020 Doha commitments is a bid to squeeze the Taliban administration on the levers it cares about most: recognition and international legitimacy.
Periodic closures at Torkham and Chaman and reported firing across the border suggest tension has already moved from rhetoric to the ground, where a small incident can escalate quickly.
Leaning on concerns already voiced by the UN and the SCO lets Pakistan frame this as a regional security issue rather than a bilateral quarrel.

What to watch — Watch whether the rhetoric hardens into kinetic action, whether border crossings and trade routes are shut for longer stretches, and how China, Gulf states and other regional players position themselves.

The story records Pakistan's assertion at the UN; it does not establish Kabul's rebuttal, independent verification of the casualty figure, or any actual plan for military action.

Deep dive

Research brief · 8 facts · 4 dates · exam-ready

The brief

Context

Five years after the Taliban's return to power in Kabul, the UN Security Council debated Afghanistan's security situation. Pakistan's Permanent Representative to the UN, Asim Iftikhar Ahmad, told the Council that Islamabad has every right to defend itself under international law against terrorism emanating from across its western frontier. Pakistan argues that the Taliban's advent turned Afghanistan into a hub of non-state actors and that Kabul has failed to act against safe havens, in breach of pledges made at Doha in 2020. The source is an editorial commenting on this intervention.

Key facts

Pakistan's Permanent Representative to the UN, Asim Iftikhar Ahmad, said Pakistan has every right to defend itself under international law at the UN Security Council.
More than 4,700 Pakistanis lost their lives to terrorism emanating from Afghanistan over the past three years, according to the envoy.
The UNSC debate marked five years since the Taliban returned to power in Afghanistan.
Islamabad said it retains the right to respond in self-defence, as and when desired, against terrorist elements enjoying official patronage from Kabul.
Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa and Balochistan have borne the brunt of militant violence, per the editorial.
Outfits named as operating with foreign infiltration and local abettors: BLA, Majeed Brigade, TTP, ISKP and Al Qaeda.
Kabul failed to uphold pledges made at Doha in 2020 that Afghan soil would not be used against neighbouring states.
Crossing points at Torkham and Chaman have seen occasional closures, and Afghan forces have fired on Pakistani troops.

Timeline

2020Doha pledges made that Afghan soil would not be used against neighbouring states.
Five years before the debateThe Taliban returned to power in Afghanistan.
Past three yearsMore than 4,700 Pakistanis killed in terrorism emanating from Afghanistan, per Pakistan's UN envoy.
September 18, 2026 (editorial date)Editorial comments on Pakistan's assertion of the right to self-defence at the UN Security Council debate on Afghanistan.

Who has a stake

Pakistan / Asim Iftikhar Ahmad, Permanent Representative to the UN — Asserting a right to respond in self-defence against cross-border terrorism; seeking international pressure on Kabul.
Taliban regime in Kabul — Faces accusations of patronising terrorist elements, failing to act on safe havens and withholding an inclusive government; recognition at stake.
UN Security Council — Forum debating Afghanistan's security situation five years after the Taliban takeover.
UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres and the 10-member SCO — On record expressing deep concern over the Taliban's discriminatory policies towards Afghan women and girls.
Residents of Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa and Balochistan — Provinces described as bearing the brunt of militant violence.
Human Rights Watch and international human rights bodies — Urged the diplomatic community to censure the Taliban and withhold recognition until reforms.
Afghan women and girls — Subject to the Taliban's discriminatory policies flagged by the UN chief and the SCO.

Why it matters

Pakistan invoking a right to self-defence at the Security Council signals that cross-border strikes or retaliation against alleged sanctuaries in Afghanistan remain on the table, raising escalation risks along a volatile frontier. The debate also ties Afghanistan's terrorism problem to the unresolved questions of Taliban recognition, an inclusive government and women's rights. For the wider region, closures at Torkham and Chaman and firing on troops point to trade, border-management and stability costs.

UPSC angle

Prelims pointers

Asim Iftikhar Ahmad is Pakistan's Permanent Representative to the United Nations.
Torkham and Chaman are crossing points between Pakistan and Afghanistan mentioned as facing occasional closures.
Doha, 2020: venue and year of pledges that Afghan soil would not be used against neighbouring states.
Groups named in the source: BLA, Majeed Brigade, TTP, ISKP and Al Qaeda.
Antonio Guterres is the UN Secretary-General; the SCO is described as a 10-member body.
Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa and Balochistan are the Pakistani provinces cited as worst hit by militant violence.

Mains framing

Pakistan's assertion at the UN Security Council of a right to respond in self-defence under international law reframes a bilateral security dispute as a matter of collective concern. The stated causes are the Taliban's failure to act against safe havens of outfits such as the TTP, BLA, Majeed Brigade, ISKP and Al Qaeda, the breach of the Doha 2020 pledge that Afghan soil would not be used against neighbours, and the alleged official patronage from Kabul; the editorial cites more than 4,700 Pakistani deaths in three years, concentrated in Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa and Balochistan. The implications are twofold: an elevated risk of cross-border military action and border closures at Torkham and Chaman that damage trade and civilian livelihoods; and a hardening of the international position on Taliban legitimacy, with the UN Secretary-General, the 10-member SCO and Human Rights Watch pressing on inclusive government and the rights of Afghan women and girls. A way forward consistent with the source lies in holding Kabul to its Doha commitments, sustained UNSC scrutiny of terrorist sanctuaries, and linking any recognition to verifiable action against safe havens and on rights, rather than unilateral escalation.

Key terms

Right of self-defence under international law: The principle Pakistan invoked to claim it may respond, as and when desired, against terrorist elements it says are patronised by Kabul.
Doha pledges (2020): Commitments that Afghan soil would not be used against neighbouring states, which the editorial says Kabul failed to uphold.
TTP: One of the militant outfits named in the source as operating against Pakistan from across the Afghan frontier.
BLA and Majeed Brigade: Militant outfits cited in the source in connection with violence in Balochistan and Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa.
ISKP: A terrorist outfit listed among groups whose presence in Afghanistan the UN has warned about.
SCO: The 10-member grouping described as being on record over deep concern at the Taliban's discriminatory policies towards Afghan women and girls.

Practice questions

Examine the implications of a state invoking the right of self-defence against terrorism emanating from a neighbour's territory, using Pakistan's recent statement at the UN Security Council as a reference point.
How far can conditional recognition and diplomatic censure influence the Taliban regime's conduct on terrorist safe havens and women's rights? Discuss.
Cross-border terrorism, border closures at points such as Torkham and Chaman, and firing incidents undermine regional stability. Suggest measures to manage such frontiers.

Grounded only in the source report — figures and dates are the source's, not inferred.

Next storyNepal moves to make foreign employment an option, not compulsion →

← All stories