Plea seeks closure of Ladli Behna scheme; MP High Court issues notices
The Madhya Pradesh High Court has issued notices to the State government on a petition seeking closure of the Ladli Behna scheme, under which eligible women get ₹1,500 a month. A Bench of Justices G.S. Ahluwalia and Anuradha Shukla heard the plea by former Congress councillor from Gwalior, Sudha Dubey, on September 16. The petition calls it an election freebie costing over ₹22,000 crore a year. The FY2026-27 allocation was ₹23,882 crore.
Source
The Hindu — National · read the original report ↗
Desk check · compared with the source
What the desk checked (5)
- A Division Bench of Justices G.S. Ahluwalia and Anuradha Shukla issued notices to State authorities in Gwalior on September 16. — Specific, attributed to the Madhya Pradesh High Court proceedings as reported in the source.
- Petition was filed by former Congress councillor from Gwalior, Sudha Dubey, who says she acted in her independent capacity. — Attributed to the petitioner in a direct quote to The Hindu.
- Scheme launched in March 2023 at ₹1,000/month, raised to ₹1,250 in October 2023 and to ₹1,500 from November 2025. — Figures and dates appear in the source; no external verification possible.
- Budget allocation for FY2026-27 was ₹23,882 crore; petition says cost exceeds ₹22,000 crore a year. — Allocation figure stated in source without named source; cost figure attributed to the petition.
- Beneficiaries fell from about 1.31 crore in 2023 to about 1.25 crore in the 40th instalment of ₹1,835 crore. — Figures appear in source; attribution to instalment data, not independently verified.
Analysts’ view opinion
Ladli Behna is widely credited with helping the BJP blunt anti-incumbency and retain Madhya Pradesh in 2023, which makes a petition seeking its closure politically radioactive. Tellingly, the petitioner — a former Congress councillor — stresses she has moved court "in her independent capacity"; asking for a stay on monthly transfers to roughly 1.25 crore women is not a slogan any party wants to own. The High Court notice is procedural at this stage, but forcing the government to put borrowings and interest liabilities on record could shift the debate onto the awkward "freebies versus welfare" terrain.
- The hike to ₹1,250 a month before the 2023 polls and the manifesto promise of ₹3,000 give the petition's "election freebie" framing its sharpest political edge.
- Because the scheme is seen as central to the BJP's win, a legal challenge to it is a double-edged sword for the Congress, which explains the visible distancing.
- Mohan Yadav raising the amount to ₹1,500 from November 2025 reads as an effort to own a scheme inherited from Shivraj Singh Chouhan.
- The freeze on fresh registrations and the dip in beneficiaries from about 1.31 crore to 1.25 crore offer the opposition a safer line of attack than demanding closure.
- The government has an obvious opening to cast the petition as Congress hostility towards women, though the story does not record it doing so.
What to watch — Watch how much detail on borrowings and interest liability the government discloses in its four-week reply, and whether the Congress formally disowns the petition.
The court has expressed no view on the scheme's validity and has not stayed disbursements, and the story does not establish whether the Congress backs the petition.
Deep dive
Research brief · 8 facts · 5 dates · exam-readyThe brief
Context
The Mukhyamantri Ladli Behna Yojana is a flagship cash-transfer scheme of Madhya Pradesh's BJP government under which eligible women receive a monthly allowance, now ₹1,500. Launched in March 2023 by then Chief Minister Shivraj Singh Chouhan at ₹1,000 a month, it is widely credited with helping the BJP counter anti-incumbency and win the 2023 Assembly elections with a large majority. A former Congress councillor from Gwalior, Sudha Dubey, has now petitioned the Madhya Pradesh High Court seeking closure of the scheme, calling it an election freebie and questioning its burden on the State exchequer. On September 16, a Division Bench issued notices to State authorities seeking their response.
Key facts
- Petition before the MP High Court seeks closure of the Ladli Behna Scheme, under which eligible women get ₹1,500 per month from the State government.
- A Division Bench of Justices G.S. Ahluwalia and Anuradha Shukla, sitting in Gwalior, issued notices on September 16 to State authorities including the Women and Child Development Department and the Finance Department.
- The scheme was launched in March 2023 by then Chief Minister Shivraj Singh Chouhan at ₹1,000 per month.
- The amount was raised to ₹1,250 per month in October 2023, a month before the Assembly polls; the BJP manifesto promised ₹3,000 per month.
- Chief Minister Mohan Yadav raised the amount to ₹1,500 from November 2025 — the only hike since the elections.
- The scheme benefited about 1.31 crore women in 2023; beneficiary numbers have dropped to about 1.25 crore as per the 40th instalment.
- Budgetary allocation for the scheme for FY2026-27 was ₹23,882 crore; the petition says the scheme costs more than ₹22,000 crore a year.
- In the 40th instalment disbursed earlier this month, Mr. Yadav transferred ₹1,835 crore to beneficiaries' bank accounts.
Timeline
- March 2023Mukhyamantri Ladli Behna Yojana launched by CM Shivraj Singh Chouhan at ₹1,000 per month.
- October 2023Monthly amount raised to ₹1,250, a month before the MP Assembly polls; BJP manifesto promises ₹3,000.
- 2023 (post-elections)Fresh registrations halted; BJP returns to power with a massive majority, with the scheme credited for countering anti-incumbency.
- November 2025CM Mohan Yadav raises the monthly amount to ₹1,500.
- September 16MP High Court Division Bench hears Sudha Dubey's plea and issues notices to State authorities, giving four weeks to respond.
Who has a stake
- About 1.25 crore women beneficiaries — Continuation of ₹1,500 monthly cash transfer; the petition seeks a stay on disbursement until financial details are shared.
- Madhya Pradesh government (BJP) — Must defend its flagship scheme in court and disclose borrowings, outstanding debt, interest liability and future financial effect.
- Women and Child Development Department and Finance Department — Named as respondents; required to file responses within four weeks.
- Madhya Pradesh High Court (Justices G.S. Ahluwalia and Anuradha Shukla) — Adjudicating whether recurring cash assistance of this scale raises issues of prudent use of public money.
- Sudha Dubey, former Congress councillor from Gwalior — Petitioner; says she filed in her independent capacity though associated with the Congress.
- Advocate Anil Kumar Mishra — Counsel for the petitioner; argues the issue concerns prudent use of taxpayers' money, not politics.
Why it matters
Direct cash transfers to women have become a decisive electoral instrument across States, and Ladli Behna is among the largest, with a FY2026-27 allocation of ₹23,882 crore. The petition forces a judicial examination of whether such recurring transfers deliver lasting empowerment or crowd out spending on education, health, employment and infrastructure in a State relying on market borrowings. The outcome could shape how courts view the line between welfare and election freebies.
UPSC angle
Prelims pointers
- Mukhyamantri Ladli Behna Yojana: Madhya Pradesh scheme launched March 2023 at ₹1,000/month; now ₹1,500/month.
- Amount raised to ₹1,250 in October 2023 and to ₹1,500 from November 2025 under CM Mohan Yadav.
- FY2026-27 budgetary allocation for the scheme: ₹23,882 crore.
- Beneficiaries: about 1.31 crore in 2023, down to about 1.25 crore at the 40th instalment.
- 40th instalment: ₹1,835 crore transferred to beneficiaries' bank accounts.
- MP High Court Bench of Justices G.S. Ahluwalia and Anuradha Shukla issued notices on September 16; State given four weeks to reply.
Mains framing
The petition against the Ladli Behna Yojana crystallises a wider debate on the fiscal and democratic implications of large-scale direct benefit transfers to women. The scheme's trajectory — ₹1,000 at launch in March 2023, ₹1,250 just before the Assembly polls, a manifesto promise of ₹3,000, and ₹1,500 from November 2025 — illustrates how cash transfers can become instruments of electoral competition, with the scheme credited for countering anti-incumbency. The petitioner's case rests on three grounds: the absence of any independent, comprehensive assessment showing the transfers create lasting economic empowerment, self-reliance, employment, skills or permanent income; the annual cost of over ₹22,000 crore against a FY2026-27 allocation of ₹23,882 crore; and the State's reliance on market borrowings and State development loans with continuing debt and interest liabilities. Counsel frames the question as whether the treasury should also fund education, health, employment, roads, irrigation, electricity and sustainable development. Counter-considerations include the income security such transfers provide to about 1.25 crore women and the legitimacy of elected governments' welfare choices. A way forward lies in transparent disclosure of fiscal liability, independent outcome evaluation, and pairing cash support with skill development and employment opportunities, as the petitioner urges, while courts weigh the limits of judicial review over budgetary policy.
Key terms
- Mukhyamantri Ladli Behna Yojana
- Madhya Pradesh government scheme giving eligible women a monthly cash allowance, currently ₹1,500.
- Election freebie
- Term used by the petitioner for public spending allegedly aimed at attracting voters rather than genuine welfare.
- State development loans
- Market borrowings by State governments; the petition cites these as evidence of fiscal strain in Madhya Pradesh.
- Division Bench
- A two-judge bench of a High Court; here Justices G.S. Ahluwalia and Anuradha Shukla in Gwalior.
- Financial liability on the exchequer
- The recurring cost a scheme imposes on the State treasury, which the petition wants quantified and disclosed.
Practice questions
- Do large-scale unconditional cash transfers to women constitute welfare or electoral inducement? Examine with reference to the Ladli Behna Yojana litigation in the Madhya Pradesh High Court.
- How far should courts go in reviewing budgetary and welfare policy choices of elected State governments? Discuss.
- Cash transfers versus capability creation: assess whether monthly income support or investment in skills, education and employment better advances women's economic empowerment.
Grounded only in the source report — figures and dates are the source's, not inferred.