Jain monk accuses Minister Lodha over Dadar Kabutarkhana row

Jain Muni Nileshchandra has accused Maharashtra Skill Development Minister Mangal Prabhat Lodha of suppressing the Jain community's voice in the Dadar Kabutarkhana controversy in Mumbai. He said he spoke to Assembly Speaker Rahul Narvekar and would protest outside the Godiji Parshvanath Jain temple at Paydhuni if the issue is unresolved. He rejected the four alternate feeding sites allowed by the Bombay High Court as 4 to 9 km away, alleging builders and some politicians were lobbying for political gains.

Written by AI from The Hindu — National · not yet reviewed by an editor · Published 22 Sept 2026, 4:38 am IST

Source

The Hindu — National · read the original report ↗

#kabutarkhana#jain community#mangal prabhat lodha#bmc#bombay high court#mumbai

Desk check · some claims need care

What the desk checked (5)

Jain Muni Nileshchandra accuses Skill Development Minister Mangal Prabhat Lodha of suppressing the Jain community's voice over the Dadar Kabutarkhana issue — Attributed to the monk in the source; allegation, not established fact; no response from Lodha included.
The monk says he spoke to Assembly Speaker Rahul Narvekar and will protest outside the Godiji Parshvanath Jain temple at Paydhuni if unresolved — Direct quote attributed to the monk; no independent confirmation from the Speaker in the source.
Builders and a few greedy politicians are lobbying for political gains — Unnamed allegation quoted from the monk; no evidence or named parties given.
Bombay High Court allowed pigeon feeding only at four BMC-suggested spots — Worli Reservoir, Lokhandwala Back Road mangroves in Andheri West, Airoli-Mulund check post and Gorai ground in Borivali West, between 7 a.m. and 9 a.m. — Stated as court order in the source with specific locations and timings; consistent internally.
Shiv Sena leader Manisha Kayande first raised the issue in the Maharashtra Legislative Council on July 3, after deaths linked to pigeon droppings surfaced in July — Specific date and attribution present in source; underlying health claim not detailed or sourced further.

Written by AI from The Hindu — National · not yet reviewed by an editor · How we use AI · Report an error

Analysts’ view opinion

AI Political Analyst

The Kabutarkhana row is no longer just about birds or public health — it has become a delicate political problem tied to an urban constituency that matters to the BJP. That a Jain monk has named Minister Mangal Prabhat Lodha, a BJP figure long associated with south Mumbai's trading and Jain milieu, suggests the pressure is coming from within the party's own base. Approaching the Speaker, writing to the Chief Minister and threatening a protest outside a temple all point to an attempt to move a court-ordered outcome back into the political arena.

Because implementing the High Court's order falls to the government and the BMC, the anger is being directed at ministers rather than at the judiciary.
For a south Mumbai BJP leader like Lodha, Jain community displeasure is costlier than routine opposition criticism, since it is dissent within his own social base.
The charge that "builders and a few greedy politicians are lobbying" taps a potent land-and-real-estate narrative in Mumbai politics, though the story offers no evidence for it.
The story notes Shiv Sena leader Manisha Kayande first raised the issue in the Legislative Council in July, hinting at more than one voice inside the ruling alliance.
The government faces a hard balancing test between public-health concerns and compliance with a court order on one side, and religious and emotional sensitivities on the other.

What to watch — Watch whether Chief Minister Fadnavis's office responds once the 15-day window closes, whether Lodha replies publicly, and whether the BMC shows flexibility on the alternate sites.

The story does not establish how Lodha has responded to the allegations, what the BJP's or government's official position is, or whether there is any substantiation for the lobbying claim.

Deep dive

Research brief · 8 facts · 4 dates · exam-ready

The brief

Context

The Dadar Kabutarkhana is a long-standing pigeon-feeding enclosure in central Mumbai whose closure has become a political and religious flashpoint, since feeding birds is a devotional practice for many in the Jain community. The row escalated after concerns were raised in July about human deaths linked to exposure to pigeon droppings, and it reached the Bombay High Court, which restricted feeding to four BMC-suggested spots. Jain Muni Nileshchandra has now accused Maharashtra Skill Development Minister Mangal Prabhat Lodha of suppressing the Jain community's voice and has threatened protests if the Dadar enclosure is not reopened.

Key facts

Jain Muni Nileshchandra accused State Skill Development Minister Mangal Prabhat Lodha of suppressing the voice of the Jain community over the Dadar Kabutarkhana controversy.
The monk said he spoke to Maharashtra Assembly Speaker Rahul Narvekar and would protest outside the Godiji Parshvanath Jain temple at Paydhuni in Mumbai if the issue is unresolved.
The Bombay High Court ordered pigeon feeding only at four BMC-suggested spots: Worli Reservoir, mangrove area on Lokhandwala Back Road (Andheri West), Airoli-Mulund check post area, and Gorai ground (Borivali West).
Feeding at the four permitted spots is allowed only between 7 a.m. and 9 a.m.
The monk rejected the alternate sites as being 4, 5 and even 9 kilometres away, alleging that 'builders and a few greedy politicians are lobbying for political gains'.
He warned of an indefinite strike if Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis does not respond to a letter he plans to write within the next 15 days.
Demands include publication of any existing government or municipal policy banning bird feeding, or clarification that feeding is not prohibited.
Other demands: regular BMC sanitation at feeding areas, medical and veterinary care for injured or dehydrated strays and birds, protection of cows and milch animals, and heritage status for all ancient temples and sanctuaries.

Timeline

July 3Shiv Sena leader Manisha Kayande first raised the pigeon-droppings issue in the Maharashtra Legislative Council.
JulyIssue of human deaths due to exposure to pigeon droppings surfaced; the Kabutarkhana controversy reached the Bombay High Court.
Earlier (date not stated in the source)Bombay High Court permitted pigeon feeding only at four BMC-suggested spots, between 7 a.m. and 9 a.m.
September 22, 2026 (report published)Jain Muni Nileshchandra accuses Minister Lodha, warns of protest at Paydhuni and an indefinite strike if the CM does not respond within 15 days.

Who has a stake

Jain community and Muni Nileshchandra — Continuation of pigeon feeding as a religious practice; reopening of the Dadar Kabutarkhana and recognition of their demands.
Mangal Prabhat Lodha, State Skill Development Minister — Accused by the monk of suppressing the Jain community's voice in the controversy.
Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC) — Suggested the four alternate feeding spots to the court; asked to run regular sanitation at feeding areas.
Bombay High Court — Ordered that feeding be restricted to four spots with fixed timings, balancing public health and religious practice.
Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis — Faces an indefinite strike threat if he does not respond to the monk's planned letter within 15 days.
Rahul Narvekar, Maharashtra Assembly Speaker — Approached by the monk as a channel to resolve the dispute.
Shiv Sena leader Manisha Kayande — First raised the pigeon-droppings health issue in the Legislative Council on July 3.

Why it matters

The row pits a public-health concern — deaths linked to exposure to pigeon droppings — against a religious feeding practice, testing how courts and civic bodies mediate between the two in a dense metropolis. With a minister accused of silencing a community and strike threats aimed at the Chief Minister, the issue has moved from municipal sanitation to state-level politics ahead of any resolution.

UPSC angle

Prelims pointers

Kabutarkhana: a designated pigeon-feeding enclosure; the Dadar one in Mumbai is at the centre of the current row.
Bombay High Court allowed pigeon feeding at only four BMC-suggested spots: Worli Reservoir, Lokhandwala Back Road mangroves (Andheri West), Airoli-Mulund check post, Gorai ground (Borivali West).
Permitted feeding window at these spots: 7 a.m. to 9 a.m.
Issue first raised in the Maharashtra Legislative Council by Shiv Sena leader Manisha Kayande on July 3.
Mangal Prabhat Lodha is Maharashtra's Skill Development Minister; Rahul Narvekar is the State Assembly Speaker; Devendra Fadnavis is Chief Minister.
Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC) is the civic body asked to ensure sanitation at feeding areas.

Mains framing

The Dadar Kabutarkhana dispute illustrates the difficulty of reconciling public health regulation with religious and cultural practice in urban India. The trigger was the reporting, in July, of human deaths attributed to exposure to pigeon droppings, raised in the Maharashtra Legislative Council on July 3, after which the matter went to the Bombay High Court; the court's remedy — confining feeding to four BMC-identified sites between 7 a.m. and 9 a.m. — is contested by the Jain community as impractical because the sites are 4 to 9 km away. The community's broader demands (clarity on whether any policy actually bans bird feeding, regular BMC sanitation, veterinary care for strays, heritage status for ancient temples) suggest that the core grievance is procedural opacity as much as the restriction itself. Allegations that builders and "greedy politicians" are lobbying for political gain, and the charge that a sitting minister is suppressing a community's voice, show how quickly a sanitation question becomes electoral. A way forward, on the source's own terms, lies in the government publishing whatever policy exists or clarifying that feeding is not prohibited, in the BMC delivering the sanitation programme sought, and in a negotiated identification of accessible feeding sites rather than protest-versus-order escalation.

Key terms

Kabutarkhana: A designated enclosure or space in Mumbai where people gather to feed pigeons, often tied to religious merit.
BMC (Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation): Mumbai's civic body, which suggested the four alternate feeding spots and is being asked to run sanitation at feeding areas.
Godiji Parshvanath Jain temple, Paydhuni: Prominent Jain temple in south Mumbai outside which Muni Nileshchandra has threatened to stage his protest.
Maharashtra Legislative Council: The upper house of the State legislature, where Shiv Sena leader Manisha Kayande first raised the pigeon-droppings issue on July 3.
Heritage Site declaration: One of the community's demands — that all ancient temples and sanctuaries be formally declared heritage sites.

Practice questions

Discuss how courts and municipal bodies should balance public health concerns with religious practices in dense urban settings, using the Dadar Kabutarkhana case.
The Bombay High Court restricted pigeon feeding to four sites with fixed timings. Examine whether judicially supervised relocation is an adequate substitute for a clearly published civic policy.
Critically examine the role of political actors and civic transparency in escalating localised sanitation disputes into community grievances.

Grounded only in the source report — figures and dates are the source's, not inferred.

Next storyRajbhar says U.P. will be split into four states after caste census →

← All stories