Crime Kapilash

Three arrested for harassing couple in Odisha's Dhenkanal

Police arrested three men in Odisha's Dhenkanal district for allegedly harassing and assaulting a young couple returning from a Shiva temple. SP Abhinav Sonkar identified them as Saroj Nayak and Samir Nayak of Bania village and Sangram Rath of Raipur village. The couple, from Cuttack district, were stopped on September 18 along the Deogaon-Tangi road. A complaint was lodged on September 19 after the video circulated online. Cases were registered under the BNS and Section 67 of the IT Act.

Written by AI from Hindustan Times — India · not yet reviewed by an editor · Published 23 Sept 2026, 4:08 pm IST

Source

Hindustan Times — India · read the original report ↗

#odisha#dhenkanal#harassment#arrest#police#viral video

Desk check · compared with the source

What the desk checked (5)

Three men were arrested in Dhenkanal district for allegedly harassing and assaulting a couple. — Attributed to police in the source.
The arrested men are Saroj Nayak and Samir Nayak of Bania village and Sangram Rath of Raipur village. — Named by Dhenkanal SP Abhinav Sonkar in the source.
They were booked under BNS provisions including sexual harassment, causing hurt, criminal intimidation and criminal defamation, and Section 67 of the IT Act. — Legal provisions listed in the source; not independently verifiable here.
The incident occurred on September 18 near Bhangargarh in the Shorishiapada area on the Deogaon-Tangi road; complaint lodged at Choudwar police station on September 19 and transferred to Gandia police. — Dates and locations appear in the source text and are internally consistent.
Police are examining whether others participated in the alleged harassment or in recording and circulating the video. — Attributed to police; investigation ongoing, no outcome stated.

Written by AI from Hindustan Times — India · not yet reviewed by an editor · How we use AI · Report an error

Analysts’ view opinion

AI Legal Analyst

This is effectively a two-layered criminal case: the alleged roadside harassment and assault itself, and the separate act of recording and circulating the footage online. By pairing BNS provisions on sexual harassment, hurt, criminal intimidation and defamation with Section 67 of the IT Act, police are treating the digital circulation as an offence in its own right. An arrest, however, marks only the allegation stage — a charge sheet and trial still lie ahead.

The story notes the incident occurred on September 18 but the complaint came on September 19, after the complainants learned the video was online — the digital spread effectively triggered the formal case.
The complaint being lodged at Choudwar in Cuttack and then transferred to Gandia police reflects ordinary territorial jurisdiction practice, where the police station covering the scene takes the investigation forward.
Section 67 of the IT Act concerns electronic transmission or publication of obscene material, and its application will hinge on the nature of the footage and technical evidence of who uploaded or forwarded it.
Police saying they are examining others seen in or linked to the incident points to liability concepts such as abetment and common intention, which can extend beyond those who physically acted.
Victim privacy and dignity are the core rights concern here, since sharing harassment footage can inflict a second layer of harm on those filmed.

What to watch — Watch which sections survive into the charge sheet, what forensic evidence establishes the video's origin and chain of circulation, whether more accused are added, and how courts approach bail at this stage.

The story establishes allegations and arrests only — it does not set out the accused's version, the precise section numbers invoked, who first circulated the video, or how the evidence will hold up in court.

Deep dive

Research brief · 8 facts · 5 dates · exam-ready

The brief

Context

A young couple from Cuttack district, returning by motorcycle from the Shiva temple at Kapilash in Odisha's Dhenkanal district, were allegedly stopped, abused and assaulted by a group of men who recorded the episode. The video was later circulated widely on social media, prompting a police complaint and arrests. Dhenkanal police have booked three men under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Section 67 of the Information Technology Act, and are examining whether others took part in the harassment or in recording and circulating the clip. The case follows a similar incident in Bihar's Jamui district where videos of alleged harassment of two students circulated online.

Key facts

Three men were arrested in Odisha's Dhenkanal district for allegedly harassing and assaulting a young couple returning from a Shiva shrine.
Dhenkanal SP Abhinav Sonkar identified the arrested as Saroj Nayak and Samir Nayak of Bania village and Sangram Rath of Raipur village.
The incident took place on September 18, when the couple from Cuttack district were returning by motorcycle from the Kapilash Shiva temple.
The couple were allegedly stopped near Bhangargarh in the Shorishiapada area along the Deogaon-Tangi road.
The accused allegedly abused and harassed the couple and recorded the incident; the video was then circulated on social media.
The men were booked under several BNS provisions including sexual harassment, causing hurt, criminal intimidation and criminal defamation.
They were also booked under Section 67 of the IT Act, which concerns electronic transmission or publication of obscene material.
A complaint was lodged at Choudwar police station in Cuttack on September 19 after the complainants learned the video was online; it was transferred to Gandia police.

Timeline

September 18The couple from Cuttack district were allegedly stopped, abused and assaulted near Bhangargarh on the Deogaon-Tangi road while returning from Kapilash Shiva temple; the incident was recorded.
After the incidentThe video was circulated widely on social media.
September 19A complaint was lodged at Choudwar police station in Cuttack after the complainants learned the video had been circulated online.
SubsequentlyThe complaint was transferred to Gandia police for investigation.
Following investigationThree men were arrested and booked under BNS provisions and Section 67 of the IT Act; police began examining the role of others.

Who has a stake

The young couple from Cuttack district — Victims of alleged harassment, assault and non-consensual circulation of a video of the incident; seeking justice and protection of privacy.
The three arrested men — Face charges under BNS provisions on sexual harassment, hurt, criminal intimidation, criminal defamation and Section 67 of the IT Act.
Dhenkanal district police and SP Abhinav Sonkar — Responsible for investigation, identifying all participants and establishing who recorded and circulated the video.
Choudwar police station (Cuttack) and Gandia police — Choudwar received the initial complaint; Gandia police now handle the investigation after jurisdictional transfer.
Social media platforms and the wider public — Channels through which the video spread, drawing public attention and triggering police action.

Why it matters

The case shows how filming and circulating a harassment video online can itself become the trigger for legal action, with charges spanning both the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and the IT Act. It underlines the vulnerability of couples in public spaces and the added harm of online circulation of such footage. The parallel case in Bihar's Jamui district suggests a pattern in which police response follows viral videos rather than the incident itself.

UPSC angle

Prelims pointers

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) provisions invoked here cover sexual harassment, causing hurt, criminal intimidation and criminal defamation.
Section 67 of the IT Act deals with electronic transmission or publication of obscene material.
Kapilash Shiva temple is located in Dhenkanal district, Odisha; the victims were from neighbouring Cuttack district.
Dhenkanal Superintendent of Police: Abhinav Sonkar.
Complaint lodged at Choudwar police station (Cuttack) on September 19 and transferred to Gandia police.
A comparable case of alleged harassment of two students was reported from Bihar's Jamui district.

Mains framing

The Dhenkanal case illustrates a growing pattern of public-space moral policing and harassment in which the offence is compounded by recording and viral circulation of the footage. The immediate causes include impunity in semi-rural stretches such as the Deogaon-Tangi road, the ease of capturing and sharing video, and the social stigma that deters victims from complaining until the clip is already public — here the complaint came on September 19, a day after the September 18 incident, and only after the video surfaced. The legal response combines Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita provisions on sexual harassment, hurt, criminal intimidation and criminal defamation with Section 67 of the IT Act on obscene electronic material, showing how digital dissemination attracts a distinct layer of liability. Implications include secondary victimisation through online exposure, jurisdictional complexity (the complaint had to be transferred from Choudwar to Gandia police), and the risk that enforcement becomes reactive to virality. A grounded way forward, as visible in this case, is complete identification of all those who participated in the harassment or in recording and circulating the video, prompt transfer and investigation of complaints across district lines, and swift takedown of the offending content — the source does not state any wider policy measures.

Key terms

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS): India's criminal code under which the accused were booked for sexual harassment, causing hurt, criminal intimidation and criminal defamation.
Section 67, IT Act: Provision dealing with electronic transmission or publication of obscene material, invoked for circulating the video.
Kapilash Shiva temple: Shiva shrine in Dhenkanal district, Odisha, which the couple had visited before the incident.
Superintendent of Police (SP): District police chief; Dhenkanal SP Abhinav Sonkar identified the three arrested men.
Criminal intimidation: Offence of threatening a person with injury, one of the BNS charges applied in this case.

Practice questions

How do provisions of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Section 67 of the IT Act together address harassment that is recorded and circulated online? Discuss with reference to recent cases.
Viral videos increasingly determine when police act on harassment complaints. Examine the implications of this for victim protection and policing priorities.
Discuss the challenges of investigating crimes that span district jurisdictions, using the transfer of the Dhenkanal complaint from Choudwar to Gandia police as an illustration.

Grounded only in the source report — figures and dates are the source's, not inferred.

Next storyTruck kills father, three children in Haryana's Nuh →

← All stories