Fed raises rate first time since 2023; Trump demands cuts

The US Federal Reserve raised its benchmark rate by 25 basis points to a 3.75%-4% target range, the first increase since 2023. In a Truth Social post, President Donald Trump said US interest rates "should be 1%, or less", calling the country "the Best Credit in the World". He said the US could make at least $1.5 trillion a year by halting trade with deficit countries. Fed Chair Kevin Warsh defended the move, saying inflation was too high for too long.

Written by AI from Times of India — Top · not yet reviewed by an editor · Published 17 Sept 2026, 3:07 am IST

Source

Times of India — Top · read the original report ↗

#us federal reserve#interest rates#donald trump#inflation#trade deficit

Desk check · compared with the source

What the desk checked (5)

The Federal Reserve raised its benchmark rate by 25 basis points to a 3.75%-4% target range, the first hike since 2023. — Attributed to the FOMC decision as reported in the source; figures appear in the source.
Trump said US interest rates 'should be 1%, or less' and called the US 'the Best Credit in the World'. — Direct quotes attributed to Trump's Truth Social post.
The US could make at least $1.5 trillion a year if it stopped trading with countries with which it runs a deficit. — Trump's own claim, quoted in the source; no independent economic sourcing given.
Fed Chair Kevin Warsh said inflation is too high and has been for too long. — Quote attributed to the named Fed Chair in the source.
Fed raised 2026 inflation forecast to 3.7% from 3.6%, expects 2% target only in 2029; unemployment was 4.1% in August. — Figures attributed to Fed projections and appear in the source.

Written by AI from Times of India — Top · not yet reviewed by an editor · How we use AI · Report an error

Analysts’ view opinion

AI Strategic Affairs Analyst

This is not merely a monetary decision — it is a strategic signal about the durability of American institutions. The Fed raising rates for the first time since 2023, even as the President publicly demands rates of "1% or less", puts central-bank independence under a spotlight that global markets and foreign reserve managers will watch closely. Linking the rate argument to a claim that halting trade with deficit partners would earn at least $1.5 trillion a year fuses monetary policy with trade geopolitics — a combination that reads as uncertainty to allies and rivals alike.

Because the dollar is the world's reserve currency, a Fed move is never purely domestic; emerging-market currencies and borrowing costs feel the second-order effects.
An open tussle between elected leadership and the central bank ultimately tests the very claim that the US is the "best credit in the world", since institutional credibility underpins that credit.
The proposal to stop trading with deficit countries should be read as a strategic signal more than an economic plan — partners could accelerate supply-chain diversification and alternative trade arrangements.
Projecting inflation back at 2% only in 2029 implies a prolonged higher-for-longer US rate environment, with consequences for global capital flows.
In fairness to the other side, the Fed describes activity as solid with unemployment at 4.1% — so the hike signals inflation-fighting resolve rather than economic distress.

What to watch — With one more hike projected this year, watch how sharp White House criticism becomes, how firmly the Fed holds its line, and how the dollar, bond markets and foreign investors react.

The story does not establish that the Fed will bend to the President's demand, nor that the halt-trade proposal is actual policy, and it reports no reaction from foreign governments.

Deep dive

Research brief · 8 facts · 6 dates · exam-ready

The brief

Context

The US Federal Reserve's rate-setting body, the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC), raised its benchmark interest rate by 25 basis points to a 3.75%-4% target range — the first US rate increase since 2023, when the Fed last hiked to 5.25%-5.50% in July 2023. The move came despite repeated public demands from President Donald Trump for sharply lower borrowing costs. Fed Chair Kevin Warsh justified the hike on the grounds that inflation has been too high for too long, while the White House called the decision "unfortunate".

Key facts

The FOMC raised its benchmark rate by 25 basis points on Wednesday to a target range of 3.75%-4%, the first US rate hike since 2023.
The Fed last raised rates in July 2023, when the target range was lifted to 5.25%-5.50%.
Trump said on Truth Social that US interest rates "should be 1%, or less", calling the US "the Best Credit in the World — By far".
Trump claimed the US would make "at least, 1.5 Trillion Dollars a year" if it stopped trading with every country with which it runs a deficit.
Fed Chair Kevin Warsh said: "The plain fact is that inflation is too high and has been for too long."
Fed projections indicate policymakers expect one more rate increase this year, with rates projected to remain unchanged in 2027.
Officials raised the 2026 inflation forecast to 3.7% from 3.6% and now expect inflation to return to the 2% target only in 2029.
The unemployment rate stood at 4.1% in August; Fed officials expect it to stay around that level through end-2026 and the following years.

Timeline

July 2023Fed last raised its benchmark rate, lifting the target range to 5.25%-5.50%.
August (year not stated in the source)US unemployment rate recorded at 4.1%.
Before the decisionWhite House criticised the expected rate hike as "unfortunate", warning of higher mortgage costs and stymied economic progress.
Wednesday (date not stated in the source)FOMC raises target range by 25 bps to 3.75%-4%, the first hike since 2023; Warsh defends the move.
After the decisionTrump posts on Truth Social demanding rates of "1%, or less" and links the demand to the US trade deficit.
2029Year by which Fed officials now expect inflation to return to the 2% target.

Who has a stake

US Federal Reserve / FOMC — Its credibility in bringing inflation back to the 2% goal, and its independence from political pressure over rate decisions.
Fed Chair Kevin Warsh — Defending a hike that defies the President; says the standard of confidence on disinflation "has not been satisfied".
President Donald Trump — Wants rates at 1% or less to sustain what he calls booming investment; frames trade deficits as losses.
White House (senior deputy press secretary Kush Desai) — Argues higher rates will stymie economic progress, raise mortgage costs and hinder business expansion.
US borrowers and businesses — Mortgage costs and cost of expansion rise with higher policy rates.
US trading partners running surpluses with the US — Exposed to Trump's threat of halting trade with deficit countries.

Why it matters

A US rate hike after two years reverses the direction of the world's most influential monetary policy, affecting global borrowing costs, capital flows and currencies. The open clash between an elected President demanding 1% rates and a central bank citing persistent inflation is a live test of central bank independence. Trump's linked claim that cutting off trade with deficit countries would earn the US $1.5 trillion a year signals continued protectionist risk for trading partners.

UPSC angle

Prelims pointers

Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) is the US Federal Reserve's rate-setting body; the Fed's inflation target is 2%.
New US benchmark target range: 3.75%-4% after a 25 basis point hike — first increase since 2023.
Previous hike: July 2023, target range raised to 5.25%-5.50%.
Fed Chair named in the story: Kevin Warsh; White House spokesperson quoted: Kush Desai (senior deputy press secretary).
Fed's revised 2026 inflation forecast: 3.7% (up from 3.6%); 2% target now expected only by 2029.
US unemployment rate: 4.1% in August, projected to stay near that level through end-2026.

Mains framing

The Fed's 25 basis point hike to 3.75%-4% — its first since 2023 — illustrates the classic tension between an inflation-targeting central bank and an executive focused on growth and cheap credit. The Fed's own reading is mixed: economic activity expanding at a solid pace with resilient domestic spending, strong productivity growth and robust capital investment, but inflation still elevated, with the 2026 forecast nudged up to 3.7% and the return to 2% pushed out to 2029. Against this, the White House argues higher rates will stymie economic progress, raise mortgage costs and constrain business expansion, while the President demands rates of 1% or less on the basis of US creditworthiness and an investment boom, and separately argues that ending trade with deficit partners would yield at least $1.5 trillion a year. The analytical questions are whether political pressure erodes the credibility that anchors inflation expectations, and whether conflating trade deficits with "losses" is sound economics. The way forward, on the source's own logic, is rule-bound, data-dependent policy — Warsh's test that underlying inflation must be moving to target "clearly and at sufficient speed" — with transparent communication of projections so markets, not politics, price the path of rates.

Key terms

Basis point (bps): One-hundredth of a percentage point; the Fed's 25 bps hike equals 0.25 percentage point.
FOMC: Federal Open Market Committee, the US Federal Reserve panel that sets the benchmark interest rate target range.
Target range: The band within which the Fed aims to keep its benchmark policy rate — now 3.75%-4%.
Inflation target: The Fed's stated 2% goal; officials now expect it to be met only in 2029.
Trade deficit: When a country imports more than it exports; Trump called "deficit" a "fancy word for LOSS".
Truth Social: The social media platform on which Trump posted his demand for interest rates of "1%, or less".

Practice questions

Discuss the importance of central bank independence in an inflation-targeting framework, using the recent US Federal Reserve rate hike and the executive's public demand for lower rates as an illustration.
Examine the economic reasoning behind treating a trade deficit as a "loss". What would be the likely consequences of halting trade with all deficit partners?
How do shifts in US monetary policy transmit to emerging economies like India through capital flows, exchange rates and borrowing costs?

Grounded only in the source report — figures and dates are the source's, not inferred.

Next storyDUSU election campaign ends; voting to be held on September 18 →

← All stories