Crime Lucknow

Lucknow man killed; wife, her lover among four arrested

Police in Lucknow have arrested Sufia Bano, her lover Munna alias Muchhad (52) and his associate Mohammad Iqbal alias Basir Ahmed (40) for the murder of her husband Ramkishore Valmiki, and apprehended her 16-year-old son. DCP Mohammad Mushtaq said disputes arose after Ramkishore resumed visiting first wife Kavita Devi and supporting her financially. He was stabbed while asleep on the night of September 14-15, and the body was moved by e-rickshaw and dumped under a canal bridge.

Written by AI from NDTV — India · not yet reviewed by an editor · Published 19 Sept 2026, 5:03 am IST

Source

NDTV — India · read the original report ↗

#murder#lucknow#police#arrest#investigation

Desk check · compared with the source

What the desk checked (5)

Sufia Bano conspired with Munna alias Muchhad (52) and Mohammad Iqbal alias Basir Ahmed (40) to kill her husband Ramkishore Valmiki. — Attributed to DCP (Lucknow South) Mohammad Mushtaq; allegation, not proven in court.
Ramkishore was stabbed to death on the night of September 14-15 after Bano left the door unlatched. — Attributed to police account in source; no independent corroboration stated.
The body was dumped under a canal bridge near Bhawakhada in Kanakha on the night of September 15-16 using an e-rickshaw. — Figure and locations appear in source, attributed to the DCP.
An FIR was registered on September 17 under Section 103 (murder) of the BNS on the complaint of first wife Kavita Devi. — Specific section and date appear in source, attributed to police.
Four police teams checked around 170-180 CCTV recordings to trace the e-rickshaw. — Range given by police; approximate figure as stated in source.

Written by AI from NDTV — India · not yet reviewed by an editor · How we use AI · Report an error

Analysts’ view opinion

AI Legal Analyst

At this stage the case rests entirely on a police narrative — arrests, a recovered weapon and e-rickshaw, and CCTV-based tracing — none of which has yet been tested in court. The FIR invokes Section 103 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (murder), and on the facts as stated by police the prosecution would also be expected to rely on conspiracy and evidence-destruction provisions, since the alleged roles differ: one accused is said to have facilitated, others to have stabbed, and all four to have moved the body. The presence of a 16-year-old shifts part of the matter into an entirely separate legal track under juvenile law.

A murder charge under BNS Section 103 carries the most serious sentencing exposure in the penal code, which is precisely why courts insist the chain of circumstantial evidence be complete and unbroken.
Where an accused allegedly enables entry rather than strikes the blow, liability is typically argued through common intention and criminal conspiracy — a legal question the trial court will have to decide, not a settled fact.
Acts alleged after the killing — plastering the floor, hiding the knife and clothes, and dumping the body — fall under causing disappearance of evidence, a distinct offence from the homicide itself.
The 16-year-old cannot be tried like an adult by default: under the Juvenile Justice Act the Juvenile Justice Board must first assess age and, for a heinous offence, conduct a preliminary assessment before any transfer to a children's court can even be considered.
The complainant here is the first wife, and the alleged motive involves the second marriage — but the story does not establish the legal status of either marriage, which is a separate civil question from the criminal case.

What to watch — Watch for the chargesheet and the framing of charges within the statutory investigation period, any bail applications, and the Juvenile Justice Board's preliminary assessment in the minor's case.

Nothing here is proven — every detail, including the alleged motive, the assigned roles and the sequence of events, is an untested police version, and all four remain presumed innocent until a court holds otherwise.

Deep dive

Research brief · 8 facts · 6 dates · exam-ready

The brief

Context

Police in Lucknow have solved the murder of Ramkishore Valmiki, whose body was found stuffed in a trunk near a canal, days after he was stabbed while asleep at home. According to DCP (Lucknow South) Mohammad Mushtaq, his second wife Sufia Bano conspired with her lover and the lover's associate to kill him after repeated disputes over his renewed contact with and financial support to his first wife, Kavita Devi. Three adults were arrested and Bano's 16-year-old son was apprehended for allegedly helping hide and dispose of the body. The FIR was registered under Section 103 (murder) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita on a complaint by the first wife.

Key facts

Arrested: Sufia Bano, her lover Munna alias Muchhad (52) and his associate Mohammad Iqbal alias Basir Ahmed (40); Bano's 16-year-old son also taken into custody.
Sufia Bano had been in a relationship with victim Ramkishore Valmiki for about four years and married him about two years ago, per DCP Mohammad Mushtaq.
Disputes intensified after Ramkishore resumed visiting first wife Kavita Devi and giving her financial support, which Bano opposed.
On the night of September 14-15, Bano allegedly left the door unlatched; the two men entered and stabbed Ramkishore while he slept.
Accused allegedly plastered the floor and hid the bloodstained broom, victim's clothes and the knife to destroy evidence.
On the night of September 15-16, the body was loaded on an e-rickshaw and dumped under a canal bridge near Bhawakhada in Kanakha.
FIR registered on September 17 under Section 103 (murder) of the BNS, among other sections, on Kavita Devi's complaint.
Four police teams examined around 170-180 CCTV recordings along the suspected e-rickshaw route; the murder weapon and e-rickshaw were recovered.

Timeline

About four years agoSufia Bano and Ramkishore Valmiki began their relationship, per police.
About two years agoThe couple married; Bano was also allegedly in a relationship with Munna alias Muchhad, which Ramkishore came to know.
Night of September 14-15Bano allegedly called Munna and Mohammad Iqbal home and left the door unlatched; Ramkishore was stabbed to death while asleep. Body hidden in a wooden box under a bed with help of her 16-year-old son.
Night of September 15-16Body loaded onto an e-rickshaw and dumped under a canal bridge near Bhawakhada in Kanakha.
September 17FIR registered under BNS Section 103 (murder) and other sections on the complaint of first wife Kavita Devi.
Two days after the body was found inside a trunk near a canalThree adults arrested and the minor son apprehended; DCP briefed reporters on Friday.

Who has a stake

Ramkishore Valmiki (deceased) — Victim allegedly stabbed to death while asleep; his body was concealed and dumped to prevent identification.
Sufia Bano (accused second wife) — Accused of conspiring to kill her husband and of helping hide and dispose of the body; arrested.
Munna alias Muchhad (52) and Mohammad Iqbal alias Basir Ahmed (40) — Alleged assailants accused of stabbing the victim; arrested.
Bano's 16-year-old son — A juvenile apprehended for allegedly helping hide the body in a wooden box and dispose of it.
Kavita Devi (first wife) — Complainant whose FIR triggered the murder case; her renewed contact with the victim was the alleged trigger for the dispute.
Lucknow Police (DCP South Mohammad Mushtaq, Additional DCP Rallapalli Vasanth Kumar) — Investigating agency; used four teams, CCTV footage and technical intelligence to crack the case.

Why it matters

The case shows how routine investigative tools such as CCTV trails and technical intelligence are now central to solving crimes where the accused deliberately destroy evidence and dump bodies to prevent identification. It is also among the early murder cases being prosecuted under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, which replaced the Indian Penal Code, and involves a juvenile accused, raising questions of handling minors in serious offences.

UPSC angle

Prelims pointers

Section 103 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) deals with murder; the BNS has replaced the Indian Penal Code.
FIR in the case was registered on September 17 on the complaint of the victim's first wife, Kavita Devi.
Case handled by DCP (Lucknow South) Mohammad Mushtaq with Additional DCP Rallapalli Vasanth Kumar.
Four police teams checked 170-180 CCTV recordings along the suspected e-rickshaw route to trace the vehicle.
Body was dumped under a canal bridge near Bhawakhada in Kanakha, Lucknow.
A 16-year-old accused was apprehended, bringing juvenile justice procedures into play.

Mains framing

The Lucknow murder case illustrates three intersecting themes in criminal justice: the domestic origins of much violent crime, the evidentiary challenges when accused persons attempt to destroy a crime scene, and the growing role of technology in detection. Police say the immediate trigger was a marital dispute over the victim's renewed contact with and financial support to his first wife, with an alleged extramarital relationship as the backdrop - a reminder that most homicides occur within known relationships rather than between strangers. The accused allegedly plastered the floor, concealed the weapon and clothes, and moved the body by e-rickshaw to a canal bridge to defeat identification, yet were traced through 170-180 CCTV recordings plus technical and field intelligence, showing how surveillance infrastructure and call-data analysis have become routine investigative staples. The case also tests the new Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita framework, with the FIR under Section 103, and the juvenile justice route for a 16-year-old accused of assisting in concealment. The way forward lies in timely FIR registration, forensic rigour in disturbed crime scenes, chain-of-custody discipline over recovered weapons and vehicles, and a rights-respecting process for the minor - while remembering that all claims remain allegations until proved in court.

Key terms

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS): India's criminal code under which the FIR was registered; Section 103 covers the offence of murder.
FIR (First Information Report): The first police record of a cognizable offence; here registered on September 17 on the first wife's complaint.
DCP / Additional DCP: Deputy Commissioner of Police and Additional DCP, senior officers in a commissionerate-system city police force such as Lucknow.
Apprehended (juvenile): Term used for taking a person below 18 into custody, distinct from arrest procedures for adults.
Destruction of evidence: Acts such as plastering the floor and hiding the weapon and clothes, allegedly done here to conceal the crime.

Practice questions

Discuss how electronic surveillance evidence such as CCTV footage has changed criminal investigation in India, using a recent case to illustrate its strengths and limitations.
Most violent crime in India occurs within familial or intimate relationships. Examine the implications of this for policing and criminal justice policy.
What safeguards govern the apprehension and trial of juveniles accused of serious offences in India? Critically evaluate their adequacy.

Grounded only in the source report — figures and dates are the source's, not inferred.

Next storyVerma Commission cited in Rahul event security document, Congress objects →

← All stories